When I set out to write about butter, I approached the topic
as a proponent of butter. Certainly it is preferable to margarine; of that,
there is no doubt. However, in doing my research, I have discovered conflicting
information as to whether butter is healthy or not.
The highest authority that I know of on the subject of oils
is Erasmus Udo. You may know that name
from his products: Udo’s Oil Blend, or Udo’s Choice, to name just two. According
to Udo, butter is best for taste, digestibility, frying, and naturalness. But
his position remains neutral on the question of butter’s healthfulness. It is
neither good, nor bad, but it must be organic and grass-fed, of course.
Butter is one of the foods that must be organic because
pesticides are pervasive and stored in higher amounts in fat. This is why dairy
products tend to retain higher levels of residues and chemicals from feeds and
other sources. Milk is a common source of the herbicide atrazine (a known
endocrine disrupter) and the growth hormone BGH, which has been genetically
modified to boost milk production. Dairy farmers use antibiotics in cattle feed
and injections, which find their way into butter. Antibiotics encourage the
growth of yeasts and fungi (including candida) in humans, and can cause
allergies, tiredness, sugar cravings, hypoglycemia, skin afflictions, among
other conditions. The use of antibiotics also kills susceptible bacteria,
allowing antibiotic-resistant bacteria to thrive. Their resistance factors can
be transferred to disease-causing bacteria.
And the sad truth is that non-organic butter is genetically
modified because it comes from cows fed almost exclusively genetically
engineered seeds or grains. Organic doesn’t necessarily mean
grass-fed. Grass-fed or pasture-raised cows are going to produce more
nutritious products than cows raised with grains. Cows were not meant to eat
grains! Not to mention, the highest amounts of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA)
come from grass-fed cows. Grass-fed cows produce butter with 50 per cent more
vitamin A and E and four times more beta carotene, which gives the butter a deeper
yellow colour, naturally.
Dr. Elson Haas, not an expert on fats, but a nutritionist, says
that not all saturated fats are created equal: when fats are short chain, they
offer important health benefits that are lacking in long-chain versions. Butter was once thought to be detrimental to
health because of its high saturated fat content. But today, researchers know
that the intake of butyric acid, a short-chain fatty acid found in butter, has
been associated with reduction of cancer risk and in some cases reduction of
tumour advancement. Of course consuming too much butter is not good for you but, a little butter is not bad.
I have found corroborating evidence of the benefits of
butter. Scientists have concluded that the CLA in butter protects against tumor
growth and cancer, is not inflammatory like some of the man-made oils and is a
source of omega 3 fatty acids. CLA also helps you build muscle rather than
store fat (assuming you are also engaging in activities that build muscle).
So looking at all the evidence, it would appear that butter
really does have health benefits when chosen carefully and consumed in
moderation. Here is a recap of the goodness found in butter:
- Vitamins
- Minerals
- Fatty acids
- Cholesterol
- Butyric acid
- Iodine
No comments:
Post a Comment